spurs-1-2-arsenal-townsend-23915

Spurs 1-2 Arsenal: Failure to exploit weaknesses

An opportunity missed as our League Cup tie finishes Spurs 1-2 Arsenal at White Hart Lane.

We controlled large parts of this game but there was a real sense of a missed opportunity in this North London derby. Both managers named weakened sides, but on paper our line-up looked the stronger.

The match ended up finishing Spurs 1-2 Arsenal and revolved around three key areas. Arsenal exposing Federico Fazio. The positioning of Mathieu Flamini. And finally, our failure to exploit their ailing right side.

Arsenal pressing

The game got off to a quick start due to Arsenal pressing us extremely high. They did this in order to stop us playing the ball around at the back between Eric Dier splitting our two centre backs, Federico Fazio and Kevin Wimmer.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-press-afc

Early Arsenal press gets Flamini forward.

Arsenal pushed Joel Campbell and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain up alongside Olivier Giroud. They also squeezed defensive midfielders Mathieu Flamini and Mikel Arteta in-behind them to condense our playing area.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-flamini-position

Arsenal average positions, Arteta and Flamini squeeze up.

This had the desired effect as it influenced much of the first half and meant that we had to move the ball around quicker at the back or send it longer forward. It also meant that Mathieu Flamini, who scored both Arsenal goals, was further up the pitch, allowing him to swoop in twice.

Arsenal exposes Federico Fazio

Federico Fazio had another game to forget. He didn’t help himself by his general play in this game and the fact that Arsenal were looking to expose him. Fazio played a number of errant passes due to the pressing, but he also was a target for both Oliver Giroud and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain to run off.

Arsenal’s pressing, the positioning of Flamini and a Federico Fazio miscue all combined to gift the Gunners their opening goal.

Under pressure at the back, Fazio passed the ball straight forwards, trying to ping it through a crowd of Arsenal players. The pass wasn’t high enough to navigate over them, but waist height. It was easily nabbed by Mikel Arteta, who was squeezing up behind his forwards with Mathieu Flamini.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-flamini-1st-goal-1

Arteta stops Fazio’s pass.

The ball was moved forwards and Kevin Wimmer had the chance to clear, but off balance, scuffed it straight back to them. It found its way to Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain who had drifted off Federico Fazio with the Argentine playing his usual reactive defence in backing away. This gave Oxlade-Chamberlain room to size up a shot, but Wimmer let Flamini run off him as well.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-flamini-1st-goal-2

Flamini high starting position sees him swoop in.

Michel Vorm didn’t cover himself in glory, palming the shot straight out for Flamini to sweep in to the net. The Frenchman had moved forward from his and Arteta’s much higher starting positions due to Arsenal’s press.

Failure to exploit Arsenal’s right

Arsenal’s press and the higher starting positions of their defensive midfielders gave us trouble, but they were leaving a ton of room down their right side. The reason for this was that they were having Joel Campbell tuck in extremely narrow to stop us overloading the centre. Anyone who has seen anything of us knows that all our attacking players cut inside and Arsene Wenger wanted to protect against this.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-campbell-position

Campbell helped out centrally, leaving space.

What this left was acres of space down the Arsenal right side where Mathieu Debuchy was defending by himself. This let us in for several good opportunities to create something. Christian Eriksen was drifting in to this space and had a couple of chip crosses for Harry Kane. Danny Rose was also in on a few occasions, having a shot that went past the post here.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-rose-chance

Rose in acres.

He also went by Debuchy and was hauled down, earning the Arsenal right back a yellow card. He then got in again and whacked the ball over David Ospina’s crossbar when a lighter chip was enough to take it over the onrushing keeper.

We were a threat down the left, but we really didn’t capitalise on it by creating higher percentage opportunities. That was until the second half when we levelled the scores up.

The passage of play saw Kieran Tripper run on to the ball on the other flank, but Nacer Chadli actually held his width for once down the vulnerable Arsenal right. This caught Debuchy inside as Trippier delivered the ball and Chadli was open.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-chadli-goal

Chadli holds width to get in-behind narrow Debuchy.

When Chadli gets on the ball he is a sure thing to drift in on his right foot, but this time he fooled Debuchy by going left towards the by-line. This created the space he needed to cut the ball back towards goal through the corridor of uncertainty. Calum Chambers stuck out a leg and deflected it in to the back of the net to make it 1-1, game on.

Sub switches

After the scores were tied up, it really looked as if we would go on and get the winner. Arsenal started to drop deeper being forced back by our possession passing and pressing.

Mauricio Pochettino made changes to get the direct running of Son Heung-Min in to the game and the driving runs of Dele Alli. He withdrew Andros Townsend who was having an average game down the right, but clearly would’ve been better suited to playing down the left and trying to have both him and Rose expose Debuchy 2v1.

Arsene Wenger made changes as well. The key one was to introduce Alexis Sanchez. This was because he removed Joel Campbell; whose inside help was leaving Debuchy vulnerable. It moved Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain to Debuchy’s side. Oxlade-Chamberlain is much better at tracking back and this helped to stop the success we were having down this flank.

Exposing Fazio once more

The changes really helped Arsenal get back in to the game. Before the switch to remove Joel Campbell we had them on the back foot and we were massively in the ascendancy. The change helped them to get back up the pitch by having more balance to their side, allowing Flamini and Arteta to get higher up like they were in the first half.

In the first 45, Arsenal had also tried to target Federico Fazio. He was having tussling contests with Olivier Giroud, which is probably why Mauricio Pochettino picked him. However, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain was also running off him. An errant pass in the first half saw the ball go straight to the Arsenal man who tore back past Fazio, but he fired across goal and wide.

After the interval and Fazio began to tire and his positioning became even more questionable. Giroud easily ran off the back of him and saw his low shot deflect off Michel Vorm’s right foot out for a corner.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-giroud-chance

Giroud sneaks in-behind Fazio.

Arsenal then looked to run Oxlade-Chamberlain in-behind him in the move that lead to the second goal. Alexis Sanchez was looking for the wide man’s run when Fazio deflected the ball up in the air with the outside of his off-foot.

spurs-1-2-arsenal-flamini-2nd-goal

Fazio deflects Sanchez’s pass to Oxlade-Chamberlain.

It fell to Flamini who was squeezing up from his defensive midfield position. The Frenchman will probably never hit another volley like he did in to the corner of the net.

From being in the ascendancy and looking like we were going to score the winner, we were faced with the score being Spurs 1-2 Arsenal and now chasing to force extra time.

Mauricio Pochettino dispensed with defensive midfielder Eric Dier to get Clinton N’Jie in to the game as we searched for a goal, but no real chances followed.

Spurs 1-2 Arsenal overall

Both managers gambled by naming changed sides, knowing they would be on the end of a hiding if they lost. For us, the risk didn’t pay off.

We know that Federico Fazio is just not suited to English football and naming him here was a real punt so that others could rest and it failed miserably. He was heavily involved in both of their goals and looked a liability all evening.

It can’t all be pinned on one player though. Fazio was poor and Michel Vorm didn’t have a good game, but we didn’t exploit the space we were getting down the Arsenal right before Wenger moved Oxlade-Chamberlain there. We were getting in to this zone, but not creating enough guilt-edged chances from it. A switch to start creating 2v1s against Mathieu Debuchy was needed either in the first half or at half time. It didn’t happen. The first move to get someone in to that space was with Clinton N’Jie’s introduction and by this time it was far too late.

Overall, we did control large parts of this match, but it was a real opportunity missed through personnel selection and then failure to spot and exploit a definite weakness.

Final score: Spurs 1-2 Arsenal.



Share this with other Spurs fans:

, , ,

12 Responses to Spurs 1-2 Arsenal: Failure to exploit weaknesses

  1. YouShubes 24th September 2015 at 4:12 pm #

    Fazio will be scapegoated by many (including me), but I did understand why we did not look to attack the space between Chambers and Debuchy more. Both seemed uncertain of where the other was and both were on a booking.

    Wenger has being their manager for 18 years and has probably faced as many Spurs manager/coaches/interims in that period. His experience showed. Mertesacker is no quicker but we did not look to exploit his lack of pace which is most odd. I would have prefered Clinton to start as striker and us to really use his pace to wear their CBs out.

    Poch chose to twist rather than stick.

    • Spurs Fanatic - Mark 24th September 2015 at 11:33 pm #

      The right side was a problem for Arsenal. I felt the space was outside Debuchy as he was often close to Chambers even though they looked on different wavelengths. I did wonder if Wenger asked Debuchy to play narrower to try and give Chambers some protection as he was often caught so far inside eg on the Rose shot chance.

      N’Jie vs Mertesacker would have been something to see.

  2. Chris 24th September 2015 at 4:19 pm #

    Fazio looked like a lost child in a supermarket.

    Carroll didn’t look like he was ever going to make an impact. His positional awareness on the second goal was suspect, and left Flamini loads of space to run into.

    We desperately need width in our attacking game. I liked the Townsend/Rose suggestion.

    Maybe Poch will read this and take some notes.

    • YouShubes 24th September 2015 at 6:24 pm #

      * did not understand

    • Spurs Fanatic - Mark 24th September 2015 at 11:54 pm #

      I hope MoPo is a fan of the blog :) seriously tho, Width does continue to be a problem. We look ok when we get the full backs forward. Rose did give them some trouble and Trippier crossed to Chadli for our goal, but this doesn’t happen often enough at the minute.

  3. Reinert 24th September 2015 at 6:13 pm #

    My thoughts exactly. Great read, Mark! My Arsenal friend flew to watch this with me, and he got money’s value for it! It was a great match, though!

    • Spurs Fanatic - Mark 24th September 2015 at 11:55 pm #

      It’s a shame we could not get the bragging rights for you Reinert with a Spurs win. Now we have to wait for the next North London derby to get our revenge!

      • Reinert 25th September 2015 at 7:55 am #

        The Derby is the best – no need for apologies or finger-pointing. We almost had them, for sure! Next time ;)

  4. YouShubes 24th September 2015 at 6:24 pm #

    sorry my comment should say “i did NOT understand why we did not look to attack the space between Chambers and Debuchy more.”

  5. Mike 24th September 2015 at 6:47 pm #

    Wasn’t this Fazios first game of the season? Its only natural that he would make mistakes and look rusty when he hasn’t played at all. I think its wrong to scapegoat him.

    Poch is the man to blame since he picked the team. Clearly this cup match was not a priority even against Arsenal.

    Hopefully we will see a much improved performance from everyone when we have our regular defenders and keeper back in the lineup against City.

    • Spurs Fanatic - Mark 25th September 2015 at 12:00 am #

      It was Fazio’s first game but I”d be pretty sure he trains in the same unit as Wimmer in between matches. He also should get run outs in the midweek matches Poch arranges to tune-up fitness and sharpness of non-playing players. But you are right clearly this match wasn’t his priority, which was a shame after we made the final last season!

  6. Tony Leslie 24th September 2015 at 11:58 pm #

    I think it is also wrong to scapegoat Fazio solely as well, seeing it was his first game. I also think his cause was not helped by us allowing their midfielders get forward unmarked, so I think the blame has to be shared a little. After his first goal, one of our midfielders should have been shoulder to shoulder with Flamini when the opportunity for the second of his goals arose. At the conclusion, you need to kick goals to win games, something we did not do, so that is where the failure to win also has to be directed. Remember we had 3 players up front who are normally first choice selections and they were also playing against some 2nd choice defenders.