With opponents continually clogging the centre of the pitch, is it time for Mauricio Pochettino to play with some natural width?
One tactic that has emerged as being successful against us during Mauricio Pochettino’s time in charge has been to clog the centre of the pitch. Our new coach likes us to move the ball forward through the middle with our inverted wide players, but opponents are easily stopping it.
Over-running QPR
Our best performance by far in the Premier League this season coincidentally came against a team not playing with a proper defensive midfielder. Without this man, space naturally appeared between the lines and we thrived.
On our opening goal, Nabil Bentaleb was able to drive into this space with the ball, as several QPR players were caught up field.
Spurs look to swarm forward.
Later, Erik Lamela drifted in to this very roomy area that kept appearing without a QPR defensive midfielder, as he took the ball to drive forward and set up Nacer Chadli to score.
Erik Lamela loose between the lines.
Getting players who can run with the ball centrally in this zone behind the opposition midfield is all part of Mauricio Pochettino’s plan. Our take-ons from the game show how effective we were at moving with the ball through the middle of the pitch.
Tottenham take-ons, Spurs 4 QPR 0.
In a 4-0 thumping what may have been overlooked was the number of failed take-on attempts in the wide areas. This was especially prevalent out on the left, where Nacer Chadli, Christian Eriksen and Emmanuel Adebayor went a combined 3 for 10 in dribble attempts. None of these are natural wing players who can get beyond the opposite full back to deliver an accurate cross.
Due to this lack of width, when we actually do put the ball in to the box, it often comes from a full back. Danny Rose has attempted 42 crosses this season, the most of any Spurs player, the next highest is stand-in right back Eric Dier with 19. This problem has been compunded by the fact that the balls in to the box have not been that accurate.
Our crossing attempts in the QPR game saw us complete just 3 of 21. The real figure was a slightly worse 2 of 17 from open play, as we were 1 of 4 from corners.
Spurs crosses against QPR.
We dominated the match, but maybe in doing so, masked our real problems.
Liverpool laden the centre
In very buoyant mood from mauling QPR, we next hosted Liverpool. The Reds have been the trendsetters for the now vogue diamond formation, which is catching on throughout the Premier League.
Liverpool have been well coached in the system and are highly effective at playing it. Just as we can see here, as the four narrow midfielders take away the space that Lamela, Chadli and Eriksen were enjoying centrally between the lines.
Liverpool’s diamond closes the space.
This has the effect of forcing us out in to the wide areas where Liverpool’s defence could then use the sideline to narrow the pitch.
We weren’t helping ourselves by not moving the ball quickly enough. This was allowing the Reds to make tackles (crosses), interceptions (diamonds) and clearances (circles) in the wide areas. They only fouled (black triangles) in the middle of the pitch, showing how they wanted to keep us out of there.
Tackles (crosses), Intercepts (diamonds), Clearances (circles), Fouls (triangles).
Our attempted take-ons, that were more effective through the centre of the pitch against QPR, are now forced out in to the wide areas where we struggled.
Tottenham attempted take-ons against Liverpool.
It’s easier to beat an opposing player when you have space on both sides through the middle of the pitch, than when you have one or two men to beat with the sideline constricting you.
As a result, the number of crosses we put in was low, as were the number completed from open play. We made 6 of 23 balls in to the box in total, but 2 of 6 were from corners, so just 4 of 17 were completed in open play.
Spurs crosses attempted against Liverpool.
Continuing problem
We’ve seen a number of matches since the loss to Liverpool, but the problem has continued.
West Brom came to the Lane and played Chris Brunt extremely narrow from the left side, as they too tried to get four men in to the middle of the pitch to take away our space.
Baggies central four with Brunt narrow.
Besiktas secured a 1-1 draw at the Lane in the Europa League where they clogged the middle and gave us space out wide. We were not able to take advantage of this, often trying to go through the centre and in to trouble.
Besiktas crowd the centre.
Newcastle left White Hart Lane with all three Premier League points by adopting a similar centrally constricting tactic.
Nacer Chadli is crowded out.
In our last Premier League match, a disastrous performance against Stoke, we also fell victim to an opponent playing the same way
Kyle Naughton was the free man here, but Younes Kaboul tried to find Nacer Chadli who was outnumbered in the middle.
Stoke central trap.
Time for Mauricio Pochettino to add some width?
Opponents have long figured out how to stop us playing. They get bodies in to the central area to stop us getting between the lines, forcing us wide where we are not very good at beating opponents or at putting in quality crosses.
We are not set up to be a crossing side, neither are we used to fashioning chances in this way. Crossing the ball is a secondary option as we are playing with inverted wide men who like to drift inside on to their stronger foot and take opponents on in the open field.
The problem for Mauricio Pochettino is does he now include a winger playing on his natural side to counter teams crowding us in the middle to stretch them out? This would also provide someone who can deliver an accurate ball in to the box.
Crosses don’t always have to be high in the air. If a player can beat his man, something we’ve not been doing often enough in wide areas, then he can deliver a pull back, cut back or low-driven cross. This is often made from inside the penalty area and improves completion rates as the ball is delivered closer to its target.
Mauricio Pochettino does have a conundrum on his hands. It’s well known that to stop us opponents just need to clog the centre of the pitch. We need to find a way to improve in wide areas in order to counter this.
We could start by playing a left winger on the left and a right winger on the right!
I would accept even just one side at the minute!
Danny Curtis has solved plenty of problems in one short sentence.
May I add that by letting wingers provide the width, we can then let the full-backs concentrate on the prime reason for having them in the team, namely defending! Then, we won’t have full-backs stranded upfield when the opposition stages a counter-attack, nor will we have large spaces down our flanks, nor will we have our centre-backs outnumbered and pulled all over the place trying to defend the whole width of the pitch.
If that sounds like the basis of a 4-4-2, so be it. Until we have the right personnel to play Pochettino’s preferred system, we should go for a tight defence to win the ball back, play it quickly to the midfield, who should find the wingers to give width and thereby open up space in the final third.
You’re right Whitehotspurs, tightening up the defence should be a major priority. The team doesn’t have to be 4-4-2 in order to fit a natural winger in, although two strikers would give plenty of targets to aim for.
Well pancetino is a bit of clown,he moans about the width of the pitch and then never uses it.Total waste of space,get rid before we go down.
width is the order of the day but pochahonkis wont see that. plan a plan a plan a- i can feel a song coming on…. all together now. 1 plan weve only got 1 plan just like avb you’re be flushed down the pan you’ve only got 1 plan. BYE x
Mark, given current personnel, who would be your preferred choices to play on the two wings assuming we move away from inverted wingers?
Very good question AJS. I wouldn’t opt for two wingers all the time, but would always have at least one natural wide player. Given current form, i’d like to see Townsend or Lamela on the left and Chadli on the right.
The real problem in the center is we have no threatening central striker.
Wingers won’t help so long as you have a sauntering, inconsistent Ade wandering around the center of the pitch. Bench him – Solve the central striker problem first and then add the wingers.
should get more width when walker returns, at the moment we are unbalanced,had the same problem last season on the opposite flank when verts had to play lwb, with 2 wing backs attacking the dms should sit deep to protect the defense, also whoever is the right inverted winger gets isolated and out numbered this has contributed to the poor form of eriksen and lamella, also ade cant play this system his first touch is not good enough and he loses the ball too easily when he should be holding it up, his success came last season in a 442 with soldado providing the assists
Adebayor is perfect for wingers on his day, he was by far at his most effective with Bale and Lennon. Unfortunately he’s not looked the same player this season for a number of reasons and is back to looking like the disinterested Adebayor who is no use to anyone. I’d still like to see Soldado given a go with natural width. First time strikes from crosses was his forte at Valencia. These aren’t just high balls in to the box, but low-driven and short pull backs from inside the area. He needs someone that can go past people eg Townsend, but can then make the correct pass – not Townsend’s strong suit.
If we’re talking about stretching defenses to open up space centrally, I think par to the conversation should be the positioning of our forwards. In the PL this has been mainly Ade, and he drops off deep and into the channels so often that opposing center backs can press up without fear of leaving space in behind.
None of our strikers offers a real threat to get in behind with pace, which further emphasizes the need to create space in the middle through width.
Further, as well as Mason has played, he has done it higher up the pitch. Bentaleb, for all people’s complaints about his lack of killer passes, spread the ball wide from a deeper position. Combined with Ade’s dropping off, it shows a lack of depth as well as a lack of width.