Could we be seeing an end to our inverted wingers?

Out of all of the debris in our defeat at the Etihad, one thing of note was that we lined up without inverted wingers.

Throughout this season we’ve seen Andre Villas-Boas use a left footer on the right and a right footer on the left. But Sunday saw an orthodox right footer on his natural side in Aaron Lennon and a southpaw out on the left in Erik Lamela.

A common complaint about Spurs this season has been the lack of width in the final third with our inverted wingers cutting inside on to their stronger foot. Whilst our full backs have been struggling to provide the necessary width that is required when this happens, could AVB be switching back to conventional wide men?

Erik Lamela on the left

Much has been said and written about Erik Lamela starting in the Premier League after his performances in our European games. After a long wait, we finally got to see the Argentinean in the initial line-up, but not on the right.

For the first 60 minutes at the Etihad, before he was moved in to the centre to accommodate Gylfi Sigurdsson, Lamela was playing from the left. He was tasked with stretching the defence and trying to push Pablo Zabaleta back.

He operated with width, but still played the role as a wide forward would. Hugging the touchline in the middle third of the pitch, then coming inside in to more central areas once up in the final third.


Erik Lamela passes received: Man City 6 Spurs 0.

Rarely did he get in-behind Zabaleta in order to cross or pull the ball back.

Whilst wide on the left, he did create a shooting chance for Emmanuel Adebayor (1), but this was after the switch to 4-4-2. He also an effort that went straight through the box to Lennon on the other side (2). When he had driven in to the centre in the final third, he did supply a pass for a Paulinho shot (3).


Erik Lamela passes played: Man City 6 Spurs 0.

One thing that Lamela does provide is a natural ability to dribble with the ball. Here, his instincts of playing as a wide forward were shown again, as he skipped past opponents having come inside towards the middle of the pitch.


Erik Lamela take-ons: Man City 6 Spurs 0.

After the introduction of Gylfi Sigurdsson and Moussa Dembele, Lamela came more central. The experiment to play him on the left wasn’t a great success as he still was looking to come inside rather than ‘hit the by line’ as a conventional winger would.

His strongest suit, apart from his dribbling, is his ability to shoot. Being on the left does take him off of his favoured foot, which makes it even more difficult to get a shot away when he comes inside.

Aaron Lennon on the right

On the other side, Aaron Lennon was staying wide, but was also unable to get behind the full back in order to cross or cut the ball back.


Aaron Lennon passes received: Man City 6 Spurs 0.

Lennon’s problem wasn’t coming inside like Erik Lamela was on the opposite flank. The pint-sized winger hugs the touchline and looks to get behind defences, but against City he was forced to go backwards often when he received the ball.

The reason for this was that Gael Clichy and Samir Nasri were doing a decent job at keeping him in front of them. Although he did manage to dribble past Clichy a couple of times in wide areas, any attempts at crosses were blocked.


Aaron Lennon take-ons and passes played: Man City 6 Spurs 0.

Could we be seeing an end to our inverted wingers?

Although this was just one game, the fact that Andre Villas-Boas opted for orthodox wide players was something that got lost in the fall out from our capitulation.

Could the system be here to stay?

Naturally from having a long-term understanding from playing ahead of Kyle Walker, Aaron Lennon looked a lot more at home on the right than Erik Lamela on the left. Lennon is an orthodox winger though, whereas Lamela is a wide forward and this is where the system was failing. The Argentinean was still looking to move inside in the final third despite being on the left, but this is his natural game.

Whilst conventional wingers offers width on paper, it doesn’t lend itself to the players we’ve signed, especially once we have Nacer Chadli back.

The current problem if we want to use inverted wingers is two-fold.

Firstly, in the full back area. With Jan Vertonghen at left back, he can’t provide the bursts of speed required on the overlap that Danny Rose can.

Secondly, our wide players need to learn when to take the ball inside and when to release the full back on the overlap. The ball isn’t moving quickly enough in the final third, but it’s also not hitting the players making the right runs. For example, Kyle Walker is getting caught out of position when the ball is turned over making him look reckless and a bad decision maker. The problem is that he is often offering the support he should be, but isn’t receiving the pass.

On Sunday we face another team that plays 4-4-2 in Manchester United. It’ll be interesting to see if Andre Villas-Boas continues with orthodox players in the wide positions to stretch the opposition or if he switches back to inverted wingers.

If you enjoyed this post, please share:

, , ,

4 Responses to Could we be seeing an end to our inverted wingers?

  1. Borris 27th November 2013 at 5:28 pm #

    The FB issue has compunded everything we trying to do without a doubt.

    That’s the management/board’s fault and it has had a ripple effect throughout the rest of the selection, hence Verts at FB and Daws playing when IMO he shouldn’t.

    Quick Myth Buster!! – There isn’t anything wrong with inverted wing-play!!!.

    Space is needed in football. –

    The reason width is such a buzz word for us is due to the high-line, the space is only available wide, again, as you rightly point out this isn’t coming due to the FB mess, but also, our wingers are not being played in their best positions.

    Lamela will still find width on the right even tho he wants to cut in, as he knows thats where space before he can cut in..

    Townsend is one of the most detrimental parts to our game!! – Cuts in EVERY TIME and achieves very little. Far too predictable. Far too inconsistent.

    Slightly different point here, that may not be popular, but Lennon is NOWHERE NEAR my strongest XI…

    You mention he was well marked, fine… But he doesnt even play on the half turn! –

    In essence he has absolutely no intention of trying to get in behind his FB!!!

    It was there to see time and time again!! – Same old story, hes got an allergy to beating a man and getting a ball in.. F**k knows why.

    Secondly. – Our midfield should be making any runs beyond the striker,.

    This is a job for wingers, No 10’s and 1 of the other midfielders (Paulinhio if you like, ala fat frank)

    How often does this happen at Spurs?!???!!? – It doesnt. It’s such basic stuff.

    • Spurs Fanatic - Mark 28th November 2013 at 10:51 am #

      Agree about the full back issue and having Jan cover there is taking our best central defender out of the position he excels in. I was surprised that we didn’t strengthen in this area as it’s been apparent from last season when BAE was injured for so long and Jan was having to cover.

  2. Tryme 27th November 2013 at 6:00 pm #

    Lamela looked awful lw…we need him rw with lennon impact sub and townsend to start lw

  3. Graham 30th November 2013 at 11:20 am #

    You make some good points on this page and yes the fact that we played with conventional wingers really was lost in the fiasco. Lennon is a shadow of his old self and usually is for a while after coming back from injuries, even up to 8 games from what I’ve seen. Lamela I rate, but only in the centre playing off the forward or preferably two forwards as I’d like to see. He got into the middle on Sunday but really wasn’t going to make any difference by that point. Borris, you are seeing the game very much as I do. It’s the high line that I don’t like and as well as making the forward play cramped and ineffective, it also makes Dawson look terrible when if he plays from a deeper line he has an exceptionally fast keeper to come and sweep up anything that gets past him. In my opinion if we’re persisting with this style then we’ll need players with exceptional passing and vision. Pirlo is the man that stands our for me, and Tom Carroll when fit.